I know that I’m less well respected, heck, I’m not respected at all, and for that reason there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that you should accept my opinion over Entertainment Weekly’s…except for the fact that I’m right.
In a review in their August 11th issue they give Sci-Fi’s Eureka a C+. The main complaint leveled against the series is that it should be less quirky and focus “more on exploring it’s X-Files roots.” The series, according to Gillian Flynn, “doesn’t know how seriously to take itself,” and “would be fascinating” if the series properly explored the scientists’ projects. She does note as a positive, the scene in episode 2 where Carter has to apologize to his house for being late for dinner. She refers to this moment as “that flash of confidence and joy when everything clicks.”
To boil it down, it seems as though if the show were funny and light-hearted that would be great, but the funny and light-hearted should not include the scientists. The scientists should be dark, mysterious, smart and totally X-Files-ey (one of her comments remarks that the plots shouldn’t solely revolve around scientist screw-ups). I don’t know if the point is that law enforcement should be treated as comedy whereas science should be serious, but that seems to be at issue in the review.
Of course, while Spooky Mulder did from time to time provide some levity to the show, one couldn’t say that he was a general source of light-heartedness and humor. And in The X-Files the majority of scientists that were depicted were evil, dumb, and/or dead by the end of the episode (and quite often the experiments either went awry or were planned to wreak havoc). So I ask, in my own quaint way:…huh, what exactly do you want Eureka to be cause I don’t get it?
One more than valid comment Flynn makes is that the love triangle between Carter, Stark & Blake isn’t quite believable (please see my other comments on the show for the weirdness in which this was initially presented).
Eureka is funny, smart, and hopefully unlike The X-Files it won’t get so wrapped up in its own mythology, myth-making, and conspiracy theory-ness so as to lose that feel. More moments like Carter arguing with his house would be great, but it doesn’t matter whether it’s Carter or one of the scientists doing the arguing.
Categories: Uncategorized
20160301chenzhen
coach outlet
cheap uggs
michael kors handbags
toms shoes
tory burch handbags
adidas superstar
ray ban sunglasses
fake oakleys
michael kors outlet online
hollister
michael kors online
hollister clothing
christian louboutin outlet
canada goose
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton handbags
lebron james shoes 12
nike air max
louis vuitton outlet online
abercrombie kids
lebron james shoes
michael kors handbags
abercrombie & fitch
louis vuitton outlet
burberry handbags
cheap jerseys wholesale
timberland boots
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton
michael kors outlet clearance
nfl jerseys wholesale
kevin durant shoes 8
jordans for sale
nike roshe run
lebron james shoes
christian louboutin outlet
louis vuitton handbags
micheael kors outlet
cheap oakleys
LikeLike
adidas shoes
michael kors outlet
moncler pas cher
louis vuitton outlet
ray ban wayfarer
coach canada
seattle seahawks jerseys
oakley sunglasses
ralph lauren polo
nike air max 90
jordan shoes
jordan 3
michael kors
canada goose outlet
rolex submariner
michael kors uk
canada goose uk
ugg boots
michael kors handbags
christian louboutin paris
timberland boots
ray ban sunglasses
air jordan retro
coach factory outlet
kate spade handbags
louis vuitton bags
celine
ray ban sunglasses outlet
ugg boots uk
louis vuitton handbags
pandora jewelry
ugg boots
michael kors handbags
toms shoes
louis vuitton outlet
michael kors handbags
kobe bryant shoes
kate spade
gucci
ray ban sunglasses
20168.15wengdongdong
LikeLike
20161018 junda
cartier watches
thomas sabo uk
cheap michael kors handbags
polo ralph lauren
adidas trainers
chaussure louboutin
fitflops shoes
coach outlet clearance
louis vuitton
louis vuitton pas cher
LikeLike